Differences between revisions 1 and 28 (spanning 27 versions)
Revision 1 as of 2020-02-25 13:14:16
Size: 1376
Comment: add page Git: collection of discussion and TODO items for git workflow
Revision 28 as of 2020-07-16 15:32:52
Size: 8465
Comment: setup meld with git
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 5: Line 5:
== Our Git workflow (work in progress) == == Our Git workflow ==
Line 7: Line 7:
Outcome of the discussion in the Fast Downward meeting on 21 February:
 * we want to use branches for issues as with Mercurial (TODO: is there a precise workflow we follow, e.g., from the slides Gabi showed us? Or the git project we looked at?)
 * when integrating branches into master, we do not squash commits and we do not fast forward, i.e., we want to preserve the non-linear history of commits and always have a proper merge commit for the integration
 * we delete branches (the pointer) after integration
 * to identify commits on a branch, we prepend "issue999: " to all commits of the branch issue999
We use Git, following the task-based workflow explained below. All significant development should be in response to an issue in the tracker, let's say issue1000. Then the usual development process involves two roles, "developer" and "reviewer" (usually Malte), and works as follows:
Line 13: Line 9:
TODO: add infos on how to do something like git bisect with --first-parent etc. (Malte sent a few links)  1. Developer forks the primary Fast Downward repo to their own account.
 1. Developer creates a new branch issue1000 in their own repository, usually branching off the newest revision in `main`. Note the exact spelling of the branch. Being consistent here allows us to automate some of these steps in the future. The Git commands for this step and the following are shown under Git Commands for Developers below.
 1. Developer resolves the issue in the branch. (Developer does not delete the branch or push any changes to the primary repository.)
 1. Developer pushes the changes to their fork on !GitHub.
 1. Developer makes a pull request on !GitHub from the `issue1000` branch to the `main` branch in the primary repository (see ForDevelopers/CodeReview).
 1. Developer adds a link to the pull request to the issue tracker and sets the status of the issue in the tracker to "reviewing".
 1. Reviewer reviews the code and usually makes comments in the pull request. If reviewer is not satisfied, go back to step 3.
 1. Reviewer merges the `issue1000` branch into the `main` branch (either locally or on !GitHub). When merging on !GitHub, make sure that
    * Your !GitHub email address is set up to match the one you usually use to commit and is not set to private.
    * Your full name is set up in !GitHub.
    * When you merge the pull request, use the message "[main] Merge issue1000." in the '''first''' text box (first line of commit message) and leave the second textbox (additional lines of commit message) empty.
 1. Reviewer deletes the `issue1000` branch.
 1. Reviewer pushes merge into the primary repository.
 1. Reviewer sets the status of the issue to "resolved".
Line 15: Line 24:
TODO: github workflow: can we use their features, such as for merging pull request of extern collaborators, if that ever happens?
Line 17: Line 25:
TODO: old suggestion for workflow, needs to be adapted according to above discussion:
 * git branch issue999
 * git checkout issue999
 * git commit --allow-empty -m "start branch issue999"
 * ...
 * git commit -m "some changes"
 * ...
 * git tag -a issue999-base -m "add tag issue999-base" <rev>
 * git tag -a issue999-v1 -m "add tag issue999-v1" <rev>
 * git push --set-upstream origin issue999 --tags
== Git Conventions ==

'''Commit messages:'''
 * Prepend "[<branch>] " to all commits of the branch <branch> (TODO: developers should copy misc/hooks/commit-msg to .git/hooks/commit-msg)
 * The first line of the commit message should consist of a self-contained summary and be no longer than '''67 characters'''. All other lines should be below '''80 characters'''. In particular, please avoid very long commit messages without line wrapping.
 * Please write the summary in the imperative mode (e.g., "Make translator faster." instead of "Made translator faster.", see https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/).


'''Branches:'''
 * Use one feature branch for each issue.
 * Only commit merges of issue branches on `main` (we make occasional exceptions for small changes like fixing typos).
 * Do not squash commits when merging issue branches, i.e., we want to preserve the non-linear history of commits.
 * Do not use fast forward merges, i.e., we always want to have a proper merge commit for the integration.
 * Delete branches (the pointer) after integration.

== Git Commands for Developers ==

Before starting to work on an issue, make sure your working copy is clean and up to date, and that you are on the branch `main`.
{{{
git pull
git status
git branch
}}}

To start working on an issue, create the branch:
{{{
git checkout -b issue1000 main
}}}

Fix the issue and commit your changes. If you run experiments, you might also need to create tags.
{{{
git add modified_file
git commit -m "[issue1000] My meaningful commit message."
git tag issue1000-base <rev>
git tag issue1000-v1 <rev>
}}}

Then push your changes to GitHub for review
{{{
git push --set-upstream origin issue1000 --tags
}}}

As a reviewer, if you want to edit or merge the code locally, pull in the issue branch, merge it and push the result to the primary repository
{{{
git fetch <URL of issue repository> issue1000
git checkout main
git merge --no-ff issue1000 -m "[main] Merge issue1000."
git branch -d issue1000
git push
}}}


You can fix wrong commit messages in the following way. This modifies history, so the resulting repository is no longer compatible with the main repository. If there is a reason to push this to the primary repository, you have to disable the branch protection and use `--force` to push. Note that this loses all commits that came after the amended commit, so proceed with caution.
{{{
git commit --amend
}}}


== Tips and Tricks ==

=== Finding a Problem with bisect ===
 * TODO: git bisect with --first-parent etc. (Malte sent a few links)


=== Useful aliases ===

Adding the following to your `.gitconfig` (or `~/.gitconfig`) file enables some useful shortcuts:
{{{
[alias]
ci = commit
st = status
adog = log --all --decorate --oneline --graph
out = !git fetch && git log FETCH_HEAD..
in = !git fetch && git log ..FETCH_HEAD
}}}

/!\ I'm not a fan of these "out" and "in" suggestions. The names evoke "hg out" and "hg in", but they are the equivalent of an "hg pull" plus extra stuff. For me, a critical aspect of "hg out"/"hg in" is that they don't change anything. I'd be happier with other names, or if we cannot think of better ones, a warning here that mentions the differences. (I also don't think shortening aliases are all that useful, but if you see value in them, I don't mind. Something like Jendrik's "adog" alias would be genuinely useful to me.)

=== Ignoring IDE files ===

To ignore files you create but that should not be ignored in Fast Downward (e.g., files generated by a specific IDE), you can add them tto `~/.gitignore` and add the following to `~/.gitconfig`:
{{{
[core]
    excludesfile = ~/.gitignore
}}}



=== Configuring meld to work with git ===

Meld works directly with git but it has to be started with the path to the repository (e.g., `meld .`).

Alternatively, it can be set up like this in the `.gitconfig` file:
{{{
[merge]
tool = meld

[mergetool "meld"]
#cmd = meld "$LOCAL" "$BASE" "$REMOTE" --output "$MERGED"
cmd = meld "$LOCAL" "$MERGED" "$REMOTE" --output "$MERGED"

[diff]
tool = meld

[difftool "meld"]
cmd = meld "$LOCAL" "$REMOTE"

[difftool]
prompt = false

[alias]
meld = difftool -d
}}}

The workflow for using meld to resolve merge conflicts is as follows:
 * First, attempt to do the automatic merge via `git merge <branch>` (or `git pull` if this causes an automated merge and conflicts)
 * Second, use `mergetool` to resolve the conflicts in all conflicted files.
More information about how to configure the three-way diff can be found in this great answer that inspired above configuration: https://stackoverflow.com/a/34119867

=== Interact with a Git repo from Mercurial ===

The [[https://foss.heptapod.net/mercurial/hg-git|hg-git]] tool allows to pull and push from and to a Git repository with Mercurial, allowing you use Mercurial for working on Git projects. It does so by converting all Git branches to Mercurial bookmarks and vice versa. Here is how to set it up:

{{{
sudo apt install python3-venv

mkdir hg-git
cd hg-git
python3 -m venv --prompt hg-git .venv
pip install -U pip wheel
pip install certifi==2020.6.20 dulwich==0.20.5 hg-git==0.9.0a1 mercurial==5.4.2 pkg-resources==0.0.0 urllib3==1.25.9

# Add to ~/.hgrc file:
[extensions]
hggit =

# Ensure that new Mercurial binary is found before system Mercurial:
sudo ln -s /path/to/hg-git/.venv/bin/hg /usr/local/bin/hg # or adjust $PATH
}}}

(Instead of the last two steps, you could also define a Bash alias that calls the new Mercurial with the hg-git extension enabled, but this breaks tab completion for Mercurial. Details: tab completion breaks if the alias is not named "hg" or if the alias command contains spaces.)

Now you can clone a repository. Remember to update to a bookmark to make it follow your commits:

{{{
hg clone git+ssh://git@github.com/aibasel/downward.git
cd downward
hg update main
}}}

[tested with Ubuntu 18.04]


== Github Configuration ==

 * We use GitHub's autolink feature to link from commit messages to the issue tracker (https://help.github.com/en/github/writing-on-github/autolinked-references-and-urls).
 * We also decided to protect all branches on the main Fast Downward repository. This means that no force pushes are allowed and branches can't be deleted.

Back to developer page.

Git

Our Git workflow

We use Git, following the task-based workflow explained below. All significant development should be in response to an issue in the tracker, let's say issue1000. Then the usual development process involves two roles, "developer" and "reviewer" (usually Malte), and works as follows:

  1. Developer forks the primary Fast Downward repo to their own account.
  2. Developer creates a new branch issue1000 in their own repository, usually branching off the newest revision in main. Note the exact spelling of the branch. Being consistent here allows us to automate some of these steps in the future. The Git commands for this step and the following are shown under Git Commands for Developers below.

  3. Developer resolves the issue in the branch. (Developer does not delete the branch or push any changes to the primary repository.)
  4. Developer pushes the changes to their fork on GitHub.

  5. Developer makes a pull request on GitHub from the issue1000 branch to the main branch in the primary repository (see ForDevelopers/CodeReview).

  6. Developer adds a link to the pull request to the issue tracker and sets the status of the issue in the tracker to "reviewing".
  7. Reviewer reviews the code and usually makes comments in the pull request. If reviewer is not satisfied, go back to step 3.
  8. Reviewer merges the issue1000 branch into the main branch (either locally or on GitHub). When merging on GitHub, make sure that

    • Your GitHub email address is set up to match the one you usually use to commit and is not set to private.

    • Your full name is set up in GitHub.

    • When you merge the pull request, use the message "[main] Merge issue1000." in the first text box (first line of commit message) and leave the second textbox (additional lines of commit message) empty.

  9. Reviewer deletes the issue1000 branch.

  10. Reviewer pushes merge into the primary repository.
  11. Reviewer sets the status of the issue to "resolved".

Git Conventions

Commit messages:

  • Prepend "[<branch>] " to all commits of the branch <branch> (TODO: developers should copy misc/hooks/commit-msg to .git/hooks/commit-msg)

  • The first line of the commit message should consist of a self-contained summary and be no longer than 67 characters. All other lines should be below 80 characters. In particular, please avoid very long commit messages without line wrapping.

  • Please write the summary in the imperative mode (e.g., "Make translator faster." instead of "Made translator faster.", see https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/).

Branches:

  • Use one feature branch for each issue.
  • Only commit merges of issue branches on main (we make occasional exceptions for small changes like fixing typos).

  • Do not squash commits when merging issue branches, i.e., we want to preserve the non-linear history of commits.
  • Do not use fast forward merges, i.e., we always want to have a proper merge commit for the integration.
  • Delete branches (the pointer) after integration.

Git Commands for Developers

Before starting to work on an issue, make sure your working copy is clean and up to date, and that you are on the branch main.

git pull
git status
git branch

To start working on an issue, create the branch:

git checkout -b issue1000 main

Fix the issue and commit your changes. If you run experiments, you might also need to create tags.

git add modified_file
git commit -m "[issue1000] My meaningful commit message."
git tag issue1000-base <rev>
git tag issue1000-v1 <rev>

Then push your changes to GitHub for review

git push --set-upstream origin issue1000 --tags

As a reviewer, if you want to edit or merge the code locally, pull in the issue branch, merge it and push the result to the primary repository

git fetch <URL of issue repository> issue1000
git checkout main
git merge --no-ff issue1000 -m "[main] Merge issue1000."
git branch -d issue1000
git push

You can fix wrong commit messages in the following way. This modifies history, so the resulting repository is no longer compatible with the main repository. If there is a reason to push this to the primary repository, you have to disable the branch protection and use --force to push. Note that this loses all commits that came after the amended commit, so proceed with caution.

git commit --amend

Tips and Tricks

Finding a Problem with bisect

  • TODO: git bisect with --first-parent etc. (Malte sent a few links)

Useful aliases

Adding the following to your .gitconfig (or ~/.gitconfig) file enables some useful shortcuts:

[alias]
ci = commit
st = status
adog = log --all --decorate --oneline --graph
out = !git fetch && git log FETCH_HEAD..
in = !git fetch && git log ..FETCH_HEAD

/!\ I'm not a fan of these "out" and "in" suggestions. The names evoke "hg out" and "hg in", but they are the equivalent of an "hg pull" plus extra stuff. For me, a critical aspect of "hg out"/"hg in" is that they don't change anything. I'd be happier with other names, or if we cannot think of better ones, a warning here that mentions the differences. (I also don't think shortening aliases are all that useful, but if you see value in them, I don't mind. Something like Jendrik's "adog" alias would be genuinely useful to me.)

Ignoring IDE files

To ignore files you create but that should not be ignored in Fast Downward (e.g., files generated by a specific IDE), you can add them tto ~/.gitignore and add the following to ~/.gitconfig:

[core]
    excludesfile = ~/.gitignore

Configuring meld to work with git

Meld works directly with git but it has to be started with the path to the repository (e.g., meld .).

Alternatively, it can be set up like this in the .gitconfig file:

[merge]
tool = meld

[mergetool "meld"]
#cmd = meld "$LOCAL" "$BASE" "$REMOTE" --output "$MERGED"
cmd = meld "$LOCAL" "$MERGED" "$REMOTE" --output "$MERGED"

[diff]
tool = meld

[difftool "meld"]
cmd = meld "$LOCAL" "$REMOTE"

[difftool]
prompt = false

[alias]
meld = difftool -d

The workflow for using meld to resolve merge conflicts is as follows:

  • First, attempt to do the automatic merge via git merge <branch> (or git pull if this causes an automated merge and conflicts)

  • Second, use mergetool to resolve the conflicts in all conflicted files.

More information about how to configure the three-way diff can be found in this great answer that inspired above configuration: https://stackoverflow.com/a/34119867

Interact with a Git repo from Mercurial

The hg-git tool allows to pull and push from and to a Git repository with Mercurial, allowing you use Mercurial for working on Git projects. It does so by converting all Git branches to Mercurial bookmarks and vice versa. Here is how to set it up:

sudo apt install python3-venv

mkdir hg-git
cd hg-git
python3 -m venv --prompt hg-git .venv
pip install -U pip wheel
pip install certifi==2020.6.20 dulwich==0.20.5 hg-git==0.9.0a1 mercurial==5.4.2 pkg-resources==0.0.0 urllib3==1.25.9

# Add to ~/.hgrc file:
[extensions]
hggit =

# Ensure that new Mercurial binary is found before system Mercurial:
sudo ln -s /path/to/hg-git/.venv/bin/hg /usr/local/bin/hg  # or adjust $PATH

(Instead of the last two steps, you could also define a Bash alias that calls the new Mercurial with the hg-git extension enabled, but this breaks tab completion for Mercurial. Details: tab completion breaks if the alias is not named "hg" or if the alias command contains spaces.)

Now you can clone a repository. Remember to update to a bookmark to make it follow your commits:

hg clone git+ssh://git@github.com/aibasel/downward.git
cd downward
hg update main

[tested with Ubuntu 18.04]

Github Configuration

FastDownward: ForDevelopers/Git (last edited 2023-02-14 15:29:06 by SilvanSievers)