Back to developer page.


Our Git workflow

We use Git, following the task-based workflow explained below. All significant development should be in response to an issue in the tracker, let's say issue1000. Then the usual development process involves two roles, "developer" and "reviewer" (usually Malte), and works as follows:

  1. Developer forks the primary Fast Downward repo to their own account.
  2. Developer creates a new branch issue1000 in their own repository, usually branching off the newest revision in main. Note the exact spelling of the branch. Being consistent here allows us to automate some of these steps in the future. The Git commands for this step and the following are shown under Git Commands for Developers below.

  3. Developer resolves the issue in the branch. (Developer does not delete the branch or push any changes to the primary repository.)
  4. Developer pushes the changes to their fork on GitHub.

  5. Developer makes a pull request on GitHub from the issue1000 branch to the main branch in the primary repository (see ForDevelopers/CodeReview).

  6. Developer adds a link to the pull request to the issue tracker and sets the status of the issue in the tracker to "reviewing".
  7. Reviewer reviews the code and usually makes comments in the pull request. If reviewer is not satisfied, go back to step 3.
  8. Reviewer merges the issue1000 branch into the main branch, either locally followed by a push or directly on GitHub) When merging on GitHub, make sure that

    • Your GitHub email address is set up to match the one you usually use to commit and is not set to private.

    • Your full name is set up in GitHub.

    • When you merge the pull request, use the message "[main] Merge issue1000." in the first text box (first line of commit message) and leave the second textbox (additional lines of commit message) empty.

  9. Reviewer deletes the issue1000 branch, either locally followed by a push or directly on GitHub. Locally, this is done using git branch -d issue1000. On GitHub, this is an option offered after using their interface for merging. In both cases, note that all users must delete the branch individually in all their clones, which can be either be achieved as above or using git pull --prune.

    • /!\ Not sure we should suggest running git pull --prune. For example, depending on your setup, it may delete all your tags that are not part of the remote repository, and you may have many of those if you are working on issues that are not yet merged to the main repository. It may be better advice to ask people to run git branch -d issue1000 instead of a blanket prune. In case it's not clear, "all users" only refers to users that were co-developing this branch and hence *have* this branch in the first place. Usually this will be nobody; we tend to have a single person developing most branches. I think we should clarify the "all users" here. It sounds like this needs to be done by everyone, not just the ones who worked on the branch in their own repositories. Good point, so let's just drop the last sentence entirely?

  10. Reviewer sets the status of the issue to "resolved".

Git Conventions

Commit messages:


Git Commands for Developers

Before starting to work on an issue, make sure your working copy is clean and up to date, and that you are on the branch main.

git pull
git status
git branch

To start working on an issue, create the branch:

git checkout -b issue1000 main

Fix the issue and commit your changes. If you run experiments, you might also need to create tags.

git add modified_file
git commit -m "[issue1000] My meaningful commit message."
git tag issue1000-base <rev>
git tag issue1000-v1 <rev>

Then push your changes to GitHub for review

git push --set-upstream origin issue1000 --tags

As a reviewer, if you want to edit or merge the code locally, pull in the issue branch, merge it and push the result to the primary repository

git fetch <URL of issue repository> issue1000
git checkout main
git merge --no-ff issue1000 -m "[main] Merge issue1000."
git branch -d issue1000
git push --tags

You can fix wrong commit messages in the following way. This modifies history, so the resulting repository is no longer compatible with the main repository. If there is a reason to push this to the primary repository, you have to disable the branch protection and use --force to push. Note that this loses all commits that came after the amended commit, so proceed with caution.

git commit --amend

Tips and Tricks

Finding a Problem with bisect

Useful aliases

Adding the following to your .gitconfig (or ~/.gitconfig) file enables some useful shortcuts:

ci = commit
st = status
adog = log --all --decorate --oneline --graph
out = !git fetch && git log FETCH_HEAD..
in = !git fetch && git log ..FETCH_HEAD

/!\ I'm not a fan of these "out" and "in" suggestions. The names evoke "hg out" and "hg in", but they are the equivalent of an "hg pull" plus extra stuff. For me, a critical aspect of "hg out"/"hg in" is that they don't change anything. I'd be happier with other names, or if we cannot think of better ones, a warning here that mentions the differences. (I also don't think shortening aliases are all that useful, but if you see value in them, I don't mind. Something like Jendrik's "adog" alias would be genuinely useful to me.)

Ignoring IDE files

To ignore files you create but that should not be ignored in Fast Downward (e.g., files generated by a specific IDE), you can add them tto ~/.gitignore and add the following to ~/.gitconfig:

    excludesfile = ~/.gitignore

Configuring meld to work with git

Meld works directly with git but it has to be started with the path to the repository (e.g., meld .).

Alternatively, it can be set up like this in the .gitconfig file:

tool = meld

[mergetool "meld"]
#cmd = meld "$LOCAL" "$BASE" "$REMOTE" --output "$MERGED"
cmd = meld "$LOCAL" "$MERGED" "$REMOTE" --output "$MERGED"

tool = meld

[difftool "meld"]
cmd = meld "$LOCAL" "$REMOTE"

prompt = false

meld = difftool -d

The workflow for using meld to resolve merge conflicts is as follows:

More information about how to configure the three-way diff can be found in this great answer that inspired above configuration:

Interact with a Git repo from Mercurial

The hg-git tool allows to pull and push from and to a Git repository with Mercurial, allowing you use Mercurial for working on Git projects. It does so by converting all Git branches to Mercurial bookmarks and vice versa. Here is how to set it up:

sudo apt install python3-venv

mkdir hg-git
cd hg-git
python3 -m venv --prompt hg-git .venv
pip install -U pip wheel
pip install certifi==2020.6.20 dulwich==0.20.5 hg-git==0.9.0a1 mercurial==5.4.2 pkg-resources==0.0.0 urllib3==1.25.9

# Add to ~/.hgrc file:
hggit =

# Ensure that new Mercurial binary is found before system Mercurial:
sudo ln -s /path/to/hg-git/.venv/bin/hg /usr/local/bin/hg  # or adjust $PATH

(Instead of the last two steps, you could also define a Bash alias that calls the new Mercurial with the hg-git extension enabled, but this breaks tab completion for Mercurial. Details: tab completion breaks if the alias is not named "hg" or if the alias command contains spaces.)

Now you can clone a repository. Remember to update to a bookmark to make it follow your commits:

hg clone git+ssh://
cd downward
hg update main

[tested with Ubuntu 18.04]

GitHub Configuration

FastDownward: ForDevelopers/Git (last edited 2020-07-28 16:50:46 by MalteHelmert)