|
Size: 1432
Comment:
|
← Revision 18 as of 2018-03-15 11:25:05 ⇥
Size: 0
Comment: No longer generated by Fast Downward
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 1: | Line 1: |
| <<TableOfContents>> == LAMA-FF synergy == If the FF heuristic should be used (for its estimates or its preferred operators) and we want to use preferred operators of the landmark count heuristic, we can exploit synergy effects by using the LAMA-FF synergy. This synergy can only be used via Predefinition (see [[ReusingHeuristics|ReusingHeuristics]]), for example: "hlm,hff=lm_ff_syn(...)" {{{ lm_ff_syn(lm_graph, admissible=false, optimal=false, alm=true, cost_type=NORMAL) }}} * ''lm_graph'' ([[Doc/LandmarkGraph|LandmarkGraph]]): * ''admissible'' (bool): get admissible estimate * ''optimal'' (bool): optimal cost sharing * ''alm'' (bool): use action landmarks * ''cost_type'' ({NORMAL, ONE, PLUSONE}): Operator cost adjustment type. No matter what this setting is, axioms will always be considered as actions of cost 0 by the heuristics that treat axioms as actions. * {{{NORMAL}}}: all actions are accounted for with their real cost * {{{ONE}}}: all actions are accounted for as unit cost * {{{PLUSONE}}}: all actions are accounted for as their real cost + 1 (except if all actions have original cost 1, in which case cost 1 is used). This is the behaviour known for the heuristics of the LAMA planner. This is intended to be used by the heuristics, not search engines, but is supported for both. /* moin code generated by txt2tags 2.6b (http://txt2tags.sf.net) */ /* cmdline: txt2tags */ |