Differences between revisions 2 and 3
Revision 2 as of 2010-08-01 16:19:49
Size: 1533
Editor: MalteHelmert
Comment:
Revision 3 as of 2010-08-01 16:29:11
Size: 2206
Editor: MalteHelmert
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 9: Line 9:
 * '''over-subscription planning (planning with soft goals)'''  * TODO: Jörg mentioned some security tool that uses FF and LAMA as "automated hacking tools"
 for finding attack vectors. More details needed.

 * TODO: Jörg and others use LAMA in an ECAI 2010 paper on cellular automata. More details needed.

 * '''natural language sentence generation''' [2010]
 . Alexander Koller and Jörg Hoffmann describe how to express the problem of natural-language sentence generation
 as a classical planning task and use FF, LAMA and a modified version of FF to solve the resulting planning tasks.
 In their experiments, LAMA outperforms the unmodified version of FF by several orders of magnitude, but is in turn
 outperformed by the modified version of FF by several orders of magnitude.
 . ''Reference:'' Koller, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2010). Waking Up a Sleeping Rabbit: On Natural-Language Sentence
 Generation with FF. In ''Proc. ICAPS 2010'', pp. 238-241.

 * '''over-subscription planning (planning with soft goals)''' [2009]
Line 15: Line 28:
 * '''finite-state controller synthesis'''  * '''finite-state controller synthesis''' [2009]
Line 22: Line 35:

 * TODO: Jörg mentioned some security tool that uses FF and LAMA as "automated hacking tools"
 for finding attack vectors. More details needed.

 * TODO: Jörg and others use LAMA in an ECAI paper on cellular automata. More details needed.

Back to the HomePage.

Who uses Fast Downward?

The following list shows some of the uses that people have found for the Fast Downward and LAMA planners.

/!\ We have only just started collecting this list, so as of now it is very incomplete.

  • TODO: Jörg mentioned some security tool that uses FF and LAMA as "automated hacking tools" for finding attack vectors. More details needed.
  • TODO: Jörg and others use LAMA in an ECAI 2010 paper on cellular automata. More details needed.
  • natural language sentence generation [2010]

  • Alexander Koller and Jörg Hoffmann describe how to express the problem of natural-language sentence generation as a classical planning task and use FF, LAMA and a modified version of FF to solve the resulting planning tasks. In their experiments, LAMA outperforms the unmodified version of FF by several orders of magnitude, but is in turn outperformed by the modified version of FF by several orders of magnitude.
  • Reference: Koller, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2010). Waking Up a Sleeping Rabbit: On Natural-Language Sentence Generation with FF. In Proc. ICAPS 2010, pp. 238-241.

  • over-subscription planning (planning with soft goals) [2009]

  • Emil Keyder and Héctor Geffner describe a technique for compiling away soft goals (á la the IPC-2008 net benefit track) and apply LAMA to the resulting problems. The LAMA-based planner performed drastically better than native over-subscription planners.
  • Reference: Keyder, E., & Geffner, H. (2009). Soft Goals Can Be Compiled Away. JAIR, 36, 547-556

  • finite-state controller synthesis [2009]

  • Blai Bonet, Héctor Palacios and Héctor Geffner show how to solve control problems by compiling the problem of generating a memoryless or finite-state controller into a classical planning task. These classical planning tasks are then solved with LAMA or Satplan. (In their experiments, neither planner dominates the other.)
  • Reference: Bonet, B., Palacios, H., & Geffner, H. (2009). Automatic Derivation of Memoryless Policies and Finite-State Controllers Using Classical Planners. In Proc. ICAPS 2009, pp. 34-41.