Differences between revisions 5 and 6
⇤ ← Revision 5 as of 2016-06-07 21:39:09 →
Size: 1954
Editor: JendrikSeipp
Comment:
← Revision 6 as of 2016-06-30 15:56:57 → ⇥
Size: 1834
Editor: JendrikSeipp
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 13: Line 13:
There are three relevant options: There are two relevant options:
Line 15: Line 15:
 1. {{{lm_cost_type}}} of the landmark generation method (e.g. {{{lm_rhw}}})
 2. {{{cost_type}}} of the landmark generation method (e.g. {{{lm_rhw}}})
 3. {{{cost_type}}} of the synergy declaration ({{{lm_ff_syn}}})		  1. {{{lm_cost_type}}} of the landmark generation method (currently only used by {{{lm_rhw}}})
 2. {{{cost_type}}} of the synergy declaration ({{{lm_ff_syn}}})
Line 19: Line 18:
The cost type of the synergy's landmark heuristic is determined by option 1. when using {{{admissible=false}}} and by option 3. when using {{{admissible=true}}}. The cost type of the synergy's landmark heuristic is determined by option 1. when using {{{admissible=false}}} and by option 2. when using {{{admissible=true}}}.
Line 21: Line 20:
The cost type of the synergy's FF heuristic is determined by option 2. /!\ The cost type of the synergy's FF heuristic is determined by option 2.
Line 27: Line 26:
 1. {{{lm_cost_type}}} of the landmark generation method (e.g. {{{lm_rhw}}})
 2. {{{cost_type}}} of the landmark generation method (e.g. {{{lm_rhw}}})
 3. {{{cost_type}}} of the landmark heuristic declaration ({{{lmcount}}})		  1. {{{lm_cost_type}}} of the landmark generation method (currently only used by {{{lm_rhw}}})
 2. {{{cost_type}}} of the landmark heuristic declaration ({{{lmcount}}})
Line 31: Line 29:
The cost type of the landmark heuristic is determined by option 1. when using {{{admissible=false}}} and by option 3. when using {{{admissible=true}}}. The cost type of the landmark heuristic is determined by option 1. when using {{{admissible=false}}} and by option 2. when using {{{admissible=true}}}.

Back to the HomePage.

Caveats for the options

Here, we document some aspects of the command-line syntax that may be unintuitive or complicated.

Setting the "cost type" for landmark heuristics

For mostly historical reasons, specifying the cost type (see Doc/Heuristic) for landmark heuristics is currently complicated. Here's the complete set of rules:

If you use the LAMA-FF synergy

There are two relevant options:

  1. lm_cost_type of the landmark generation method (currently only used by lm_rhw)

  2. cost_type of the synergy declaration (lm_ff_syn)

The cost type of the synergy's landmark heuristic is determined by option 1. when using admissible=false and by option 2. when using admissible=true.

The cost type of the synergy's FF heuristic is determined by option 2.

If you do not use the LAMA-FF synergy

There are three relevant options:

  1. lm_cost_type of the landmark generation method (currently only used by lm_rhw)

  2. cost_type of the landmark heuristic declaration (lmcount)

The cost type of the landmark heuristic is determined by option 1. when using admissible=false and by option 2. when using admissible=true.

Option 2 is ignored in this case.

Using preferred operators with the lmcount heuristic

Unlike all other (current) heuristics, the lmcount heuristic requires a special setting pref=true to enable preferred operator support. Hence, to use preferred operators with that heuristic, two things must be done at the moment:

  1. Set pref=true in the heuristic specification.

  2. Include the heuristic in the list of heuristics in the preferred specification of the search engine.