Differences between revisions 2 and 3
Revision 2 as of 2014-10-22 19:41:12
Size: 4252
Editor: JendrikSeipp
Comment: Adapt for new driver script
Revision 3 as of 2014-10-23 09:47:40
Size: 3804
Editor: MalteHelmert
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 3: Line 3:
= IPC planners = = IPC planner configurations vs. IPC planners =
Line 5: Line 5:
This page describes how to run any of the planners based on Fast Downward that participated in IPC 2011. Before reading this page, it is strongly recommended that you familiarize yourself with the information on ObtainingAndRunningFastDownward and PlannerUsage. This page describes how to run any of the planner configurations based on Fast Downward that participated in IPC 2011. Before reading this page, it is strongly recommended that you familiarize yourself with the information on ObtainingAndRunningFastDownward and PlannerUsage.
Line 33: Line 33:
For the most part, you can run them like any other planner configuration, but some of them are a bit special:

 * LAMA 2011 actually corresponds to two different parameter settings, depending on whether the input task uses unit-cost actions only or general action costs.
 * The portfolio planners run several planner configurations in sequence by setting appropriate time limits (in both satisficing and optimizing configurations) and quality bounds (in satisficing configurations).

To simplify running IPC configurations, the {{{src/fast-downward.py}}} script provides short aliases for them.
To run e.g. LAMA-2011 on the first gripper task run
The {{{src/fast-downward.py}}} script provides short aliases for the IPC configurations.
To run e.g. the LAMA-2011 configuration on the first gripper task run

Back to the HomePage.

IPC planner configurations vs. IPC planners

This page describes how to run any of the planner configurations based on Fast Downward that participated in IPC 2011. Before reading this page, it is strongly recommended that you familiarize yourself with the information on ObtainingAndRunningFastDownward and PlannerUsage.

What is the relationship between "Fast Downward" and the IPC 2011 planners based on Fast Downward?

All the following planners from IPC 2011 (called "IPC configurations" in the following) used exactly the same code, a snapshot from the Fast Downward repository. They only differ in command-line options for the search component of the planner.

  • satisficing track:
    • Fast Downward Autotune 1, satisficing version (seq-sat-fd-autotune-1)

    • Fast Downward Autotune 2, satisficing version (seq-sat-fd-autotune-2)

    • *Fast Downward Stone Soup 1, satisficing version (seq-sat-fdss-1)

    • *Fast Downward Stone Soup 2, satisficing version (seq-sat-fdss-2)

    • LAMA 2011 (seq-sat-lama-2011)

  • optimization track:
    • BJOLP (seq-opt-bjolp)

    • Fast Downward Autotune, optimizing version (seq-opt-fd-autotune)

    • *Fast Downward Stone Soup 1, optimizing version (seq-opt-fdss-1)

    • *Fast Downward Stone Soup 2, optimizing version (seq-opt-fdss-2)

    • LM-Cut (seq-opt-lmcut)

    • *Merge and Shrink (seq-opt-merge-and-shrink)

    • Selective Max (seq-opt-selmax)

The planners marked with a star (*) are portfolio configurations, which are a bit special because they use hard-coded time limits. See below.

How do I run an IPC configuration?

The src/fast-downward.py script provides short aliases for the IPC configurations. To run e.g. the LAMA-2011 configuration on the first gripper task run

./fast-downward.py --alias seq-sat-lama-2011 ../benchmarks/gripper/prob01.pddl

and the correct parameter settings will automatically be set. To see all available aliases run

./fast-downward.py --show-aliases

If you are interested in the actual parameter settings, look inside the src/driver/aliases.py module.

Using time limits other than 30 minutes

The portfolio configurations are intimately tied to the competition time limit of 30 minutes. If you use a different time limit, you cannot use these planner configurations out of the box.

Please also note that all planner configurations have an internal time limit of 5 minutes for the invariant synthesis part of the translator. This is generous for all but very few planning tasks, but still it makes sense to adapt this value if you're running the overall planner with a different overall timeout from the usual 30 minutes, especially if it is a signficantly lower time limit.

Which code version should I use?

The two main options are

  • the snapshot used at IPC 2011
  • the most current version of the default branch of the repository

We usually recommend using the newest code from the repository since we tend to fix bugs every now and then (but of course, we also introduce new ones...). If you do a proper experiment and performance in some domain looks worse than what you'd expect from our papers or the IPC results, we're very happy to be notified since this may be an indication that we introduced a bug.

In case you are sure you want the IPC 2011 version of the planner, you can get it by updating to the branch ipc-2011-fixes in the repository. This is identical to the code that was run at IPC 2011 except that it uses 32-bit mode rather than 64-bit mode. For an explanation of which of these two modes you want and how to set it, please check the PlannerUsage page.

FastDownward: IpcPlanners (last edited 2023-10-12 12:17:07 by SilvanSievers)